Private markets, explained from both sides of the tableEducation only. Not investment advice.

Reading performance|Explainer

DPI vs TVPI

One number counts cash you have actually received. The other counts value on paper. Knowing which is which is the first step to reading any fund report.

The short version

Cash back, value still held, and the two together

Private funds report three multiples, all measured against paid-in capital, the money LPs have actually sent so far. The GIPS standards, the performance-presentation code run by CFA Institute, name them:

DPI = distributions ÷ paid-in capital
RVPI = residual value (NAV) ÷ paid-in capital
TVPI = (distributions + NAV) ÷ paid-in capital = DPI + RVPI

DPI (distributions to paid-in, the realisation multiple) is cash in your account. RVPI (residual value to paid-in) is what the fund says the investments it still holds are worth. TVPI (total value to paid-in, the investment multiple) adds the two.

Only DPI is cash. RVPI is an estimate. Each investment is revalued at fair value at every reporting date under the IPEV valuation guidelines, but until it is sold, nobody has paid that price.

Worked example|Hypothetical

Same TVPI, very different funds

Two hypothetical funds, six years old, each with US$100m paid in. Not data on any real fund.

FundPaid inDistributedNAVDPIRVPITVPI
Fund A10090600.90x0.60x1.50x
Fund B100101400.10x1.40x1.50x

US$m. Both funds report a 1.50x TVPI. Fund A has returned 90% of the cash; Fund B has returned 10%, and 93% of its total value (140 of 150) is still a valuation.

Why IRR tells a different story

The internal rate of return is a money-weighted return: it reflects the timing and size of every cash flow in and out. Carta puts the contrast neatly: IRR is tied closely to when returns arrive, while TVPI is time neutral. A fund that returns 1.5x in four years and one that takes twelve report the same TVPI and very different IRRs.

Time matters because cash comes back slowly. In Carta’s Q2 2026 data, US venture funds of the 2017 vintage, now close to ten years old, had a median DPI of 0.37x: most of their reported value was still on paper.

Gross, net and credit lines

Gross figures are before fees, expenses and carry; net figures are what LPs actually earn. In the US, the SEC’s marketing rule says an adviser’s advertisement may not show gross performance unless net performance is shown with at least equal prominence, over the same period and method.

Funds that borrow against LPs’ commitments (a subscription line) delay capital calls, which can lift IRR without changing the multiple much. ILPA’s 2025 performance templates, as summarised by Alston & Bird, ask for figures with and without the effect of these facilities.

Questions to ask about any fund report

  1. What is the DPI, and how much of the TVPI is still NAV?
  2. Are the figures net of fees, expenses and carry? Where is net shown next to gross?
  3. What is the as-of date, and what vintage year is the fund?
  4. What is IRR with and without the subscription line?
  5. How are the remaining holdings valued, and by whom?

Education only. This page explains how fund structures and terms generally work. It is not investment, legal or tax advice and is not a view on any fund, manager or product. Worked examples are hypothetical.

Go deeper

Read a real-looking fund report

“Reading performance: IRR, MOIC, TVPI, DPI and RVPI” and “Benchmarking and PME” are lessons 7 and 8 of Foundations. Lesson 15 then hands you a fictional fund one-pager to pull apart with everything you have learned.

See the courses

The LP desk

More like this, weekly on Tuesdays

One lesson, one chart and one take on private markets, free.

Sources

Where the numbers come from

Cited and paraphrased. Figures are as published at the date shown and may since have changed. Checked by us between 21 and 27 October 2026.

  1. CFA Institute, Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS) for Firms, 2020 edition, provisions 5.A.4 and 7.A.4. www.gipsstandards.org
  2. Carta, VC Fund Performance: Q2 2026 (23 Sep 2026). US-domiciled venture funds on Carta’s platform; venture only. carta.com/data/vc-fund-performance-q2-2026-full-report/
  3. IPEV Board, International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation Guidelines (Dec 2025), paraphrased. www.privateequityvaluation.com
  4. US SEC, Investment adviser marketing rule, 17 CFR 275.206(4)-1(d), via Cornell LII. www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/275.206(4)-1
  5. Alston & Bird, “ILPA Releases Updated Reporting Template and New Performance Templates” (24 Feb 2025). www.alston.com